Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF DAYTON 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF DAYTON
CCN 362028 | OH | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $487K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$896K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$487K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$896K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$653K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$896K
Modeled Uplift
$610K
Risk-Adjusted
-$286K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$341K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$337K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$207K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$896K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$341K$341K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$328K$9K$337K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$155K$207K$653K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$85K$170K$255K$341K$341K$341K$341K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$84K$169K$253K$337K$337K$337K$337K
A/R Days Reduction$0$69K$138K$207K$207K$207K$207K$207K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$244K$488K$726K$896K$896K$896K$896K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $896K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 18.7x84% / 21.1x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x92% / 26.0x
9.0x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x
10.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.1x
11.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.2x77% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x
12.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x75% / 16.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
54%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 54% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$487K$487K2.9%
Year 1$501K+$597K$1.1M6.5%
Year 2$517K+$896K$1.4M8.3%
Year 3$532K+$896K$1.4M8.4%
Year 4$548K+$896K$1.4M8.5%
Year 5$564K+$896K$1.5M8.6%
$4.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.2M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$775K
Organic Growth
$9.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$170K$255K$341K$409K
Denial Rate Reductio$169K$253K$337K$405K
A/R Days Reduction$104K$155K$207K$249K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$448K$672K$896K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 117 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.9%-12.5%-1.6%10.1%
P57
Net-to-Gross17.7%26.0%36.2%45.4%
P12
Occupancy55.5%27.1%39.0%62.6%
P68
Rev/Bed$387K$363K$984K$1.9M
P26
Exp/Bed$376K$367K$917K$1.9M
P26

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML