Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - YOUNGSTOWN 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - YOUNGSTOWN
CCN 362024 | OH | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$753K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$731K
Risk-Adjusted
-$301K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$392K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$388K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$239K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$392K$392K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$378K$11K$388K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$60K$179K$239K$753K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$98K$196K$294K$392K$392K$392K$392K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$97K$194K$291K$388K$388K$388K$388K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$159K$239K$239K$239K$239K$239K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$281K$562K$837K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x
9.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x
10.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x
11.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.3x
12.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
31%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 31% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 4.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M5.8%
Year 1$1.2M+$688K$1.9M9.5%
Year 2$1.2M+$1.0M$2.2M11.5%
Year 3$1.3M+$1.0M$2.3M11.6%
Year 4$1.3M+$1.0M$2.3M11.8%
Year 5$1.3M+$1.0M$2.4M12.0%
$11.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.5M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$10.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$196K$294K$392K$471K
Denial Rate Reductio$194K$291K$388K$466K
A/R Days Reduction$119K$179K$239K$286K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$13K$15K
Total$516K$774K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 114 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.8%-12.2%-1.7%10.6%
P65
Net-to-Gross15.5%26.1%36.4%45.5%
P6
Occupancy68.6%27.0%39.4%61.8%
P82
Rev/Bed$467K$359K$968K$2.0M
P32
Exp/Bed$440K$360K$902K$1.9M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML