Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - CINCINNATI INC. 2026-04-26 18:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - CINCINNATI INC.
CCN 362019 | OH | 71 beds | Current EBITDA $4.9M → Pro Forma $7.0M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$598K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$783K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$775K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$476K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$783K$783K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$754K$22K$775K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$120K$356K$476K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$196K$391K$587K$783K$783K$783K$783K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$194K$388K$581K$775K$775K$775K$775K
A/R Days Reduction$0$159K$318K$476K$476K$476K$476K$476K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$561K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.9M$4.9M12.6%
Year 1$5.1M+$1.4M$6.5M16.5%
Year 2$5.2M+$2.1M$7.3M18.7%
Year 3$5.4M+$2.1M$7.5M19.1%
Year 4$5.6M+$2.1M$7.6M19.5%
Year 5$5.7M+$2.1M$7.8M19.9%
$49.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$85.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$36.3M
Value Created
$7.8M
Exit EBITDA
$7.9M
Organic Growth
$20.6M
RCM Value Creation
$7.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$391K$587K$783K$940K
Denial Rate Reductio$388K$581K$775K$930K
A/R Days Reduction$238K$357K$476K$572K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.6%-13.8%1.4%9.6%
P80
Net-to-Gross12.4%22.2%31.0%41.6%
P3
Occupancy70.0%32.9%52.9%67.1%
P83
Rev/Bed$551K$300K$586K$1.4M
P47
Exp/Bed$482K$310K$549K$1.3M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML