Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH -NE OHIO 2026-04-26 08:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH -NE OHIO
CCN 362016 | OH | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $136K → Pro Forma $697K (+$560K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$136K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$560K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$697K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$405K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$560K
Modeled Uplift
$368K
Risk-Adjusted
-$193K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$211K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$211K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$128K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$560K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$203K$8K$211K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$211K$211K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$32K$96K$128K$405K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$53K$106K$159K$211K$211K$211K$211K
Cost to Collect$0$53K$106K$158K$211K$211K$211K$211K
A/R Days Reduction$0$43K$86K$128K$128K$128K$128K$128K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$153K$306K$455K$560K$560K$560K$560K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $560K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x104% / 35.3x109% / 39.6x113% / 43.9x115% / 46.0x117% / 48.1x
9.0x99% / 31.0x103% / 34.8x108% / 38.6x110% / 40.5x112% / 42.4x
10.0x94% / 27.6x99% / 31.0x103% / 34.4x105% / 36.1x107% / 37.9x
11.0x90% / 24.8x95% / 27.9x99% / 31.0x101% / 32.6x103% / 34.1x
12.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
75%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 75% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$136K$136K1.3%
Year 1$140K+$374K$514K4.9%
Year 2$145K+$560K$705K6.7%
Year 3$149K+$560K$709K6.7%
Year 4$153K+$560K$714K6.8%
Year 5$158K+$560K$718K6.8%
$1.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$7.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.5M
Value Created
$718K
Exit EBITDA
$217K
Organic Growth
$5.6M
RCM Value Creation
$718K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$106K$159K$211K$254K
Cost to Collect$106K$158K$211K$253K
A/R Days Reduction$64K$96K$128K$154K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$280K$420K$560K$673K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-11.1%-1.7%12.0%
P55
Net-to-Gross15.5%29.1%38.1%47.4%
P3
Occupancy44.8%26.1%37.5%63.7%
P55
Rev/Bed$352K$422K$1.1M$2.1M
P20
Exp/Bed$347K$391K$979K$2.1M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML