Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOCKING VALLEY 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOCKING VALLEY
CCN 361330 | OH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $5.6M → Pro Forma $7.6M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$677K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$788K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$781K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$480K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$788K$788K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$759K$22K$781K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$121K$359K$480K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$197K$394K$591K$788K$788K$788K$788K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$195K$390K$585K$781K$781K$781K$781K
A/R Days Reduction$0$160K$320K$480K$480K$480K$480K$480K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$565K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.6M$5.6M14.1%
Year 1$5.7M+$1.4M$7.1M18.1%
Year 2$5.9M+$2.1M$8.0M20.3%
Year 3$6.1M+$2.1M$8.2M20.7%
Year 4$6.3M+$2.1M$8.3M21.2%
Year 5$6.5M+$2.1M$8.5M21.6%
$55.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$93.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$38.1M
Value Created
$8.5M
Exit EBITDA
$8.9M
Organic Growth
$20.7M
RCM Value Creation
$8.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$394K$591K$788K$946K
Denial Rate Reductio$390K$585K$781K$937K
A/R Days Reduction$240K$360K$480K$576K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.1%-11.4%-1.9%11.5%
P78
Net-to-Gross40.1%29.7%38.6%47.6%
P52
Occupancy45.8%25.4%37.1%57.8%
P63
Rev/Bed$1.6M$436K$1.1M$2.1M
P65
Exp/Bed$1.4M$421K$1.1M$2.2M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML