Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AULTMAN ORRVILLE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AULTMAN ORRVILLE HOSPITAL
CCN 361323 | OH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $5.0M (+$3.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$58.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$707K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$37K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$32K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$178K$529K$707K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$291K$581K$872K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$288K$575K$863K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$236K$471K$707K$707K$707K$707K$707K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K
Cumulative$0$832K$1.7M$2.5M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 16.9x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.5x88% / 23.7x
9.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
10.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
11.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
12.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
50%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 50% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M3.3%
Year 1$2.0M+$2.0M$4.0M6.9%
Year 2$2.0M+$3.1M$5.1M8.7%
Year 3$2.1M+$3.1M$5.1M8.9%
Year 4$2.1M+$3.1M$5.2M9.0%
Year 5$2.2M+$3.1M$5.3M9.1%
$19.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$58.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$38.9M
Value Created
$5.3M
Exit EBITDA
$3.0M
Organic Growth
$30.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$581K$872K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$575K$863K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$354K$530K$707K$848K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$28K$37K$45K
Total$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.3%-11.4%-1.9%11.5%
P61
Net-to-Gross44.4%29.7%38.6%47.6%
P66
Occupancy37.4%25.4%37.1%57.8%
P52
Rev/Bed$2.3M$436K$1.1M$2.1M
P81
Exp/Bed$2.2M$421K$1.1M$2.2M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML