Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UH GENEVA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UH GENEVA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 361307 | OH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $6.8M → Pro Forma $10.0M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$61.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$880K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$749K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$189K$560K$749K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$308K$616K$923K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$305K$609K$914K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$250K$499K$749K$749K$749K$749K$749K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$882K$1.8M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
10.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.8M$6.8M11.0%
Year 1$7.0M+$2.2M$9.1M14.9%
Year 2$7.2M+$3.2M$10.4M17.0%
Year 3$7.4M+$3.2M$10.7M17.3%
Year 4$7.6M+$3.2M$10.9M17.7%
Year 5$7.9M+$3.2M$11.1M18.0%
$67.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$122.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.3M
Value Created
$11.1M
Exit EBITDA
$10.8M
Organic Growth
$32.4M
RCM Value Creation
$11.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$616K$923K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$609K$914K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$375K$562K$749K$899K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.0%-11.4%-1.9%11.5%
P73
Net-to-Gross29.3%29.7%38.6%47.6%
P24
Occupancy65.5%25.4%37.1%57.8%
P81
Rev/Bed$2.5M$436K$1.1M$2.1M
P84
Exp/Bed$2.2M$421K$1.1M$2.2M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML