Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 361301 | OH | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-16.8M → Pro Forma $-15.5M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-16.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-15.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$906K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$753K
Risk-Adjusted
-$490K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$473K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$468K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$288K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$473K$473K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$455K$13K$468K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$215K$288K$906K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$118K$236K$354K$473K$473K$473K$473K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$117K$234K$351K$468K$468K$468K$468K
A/R Days Reduction$0$96K$192K$288K$288K$288K$288K$288K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$339K$677K$1.0M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-16.8M$-16.8M-71.1%
Year 1$-17.3M+$829K$-16.5M-69.7%
Year 2$-17.8M+$1.2M$-16.6M-70.1%
Year 3$-18.3M+$1.2M$-17.1M-72.4%
Year 4$-18.9M+$1.2M$-17.7M-74.7%
Year 5$-19.5M+$1.2M$-18.2M-77.1%
$-167.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-200.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-32.5M
Value Created
$-18.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-26.7M
Organic Growth
$12.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-18.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$236K$354K$473K$567K
Denial Rate Reductio$234K$351K$468K$561K
A/R Days Reduction$144K$216K$288K$345K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$622K$932K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-11.4%-1.9%11.5%
P0
Net-to-Gross46.5%29.7%38.6%47.6%
P71
Occupancy22.0%25.4%37.1%57.8%
P14
Rev/Bed$945K$436K$1.1M$2.1M
P39
Exp/Bed$1.6M$421K$1.1M$2.2M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML