Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KETTERING HEALTH TROY 2026-04-26 11:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KETTERING HEALTH TROY
CCN 360368 | OH | 28 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.6M → Pro Forma $-1.2M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$64.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$780K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$41K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$197K$584K$780K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$41K$41K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$321K$641K$962K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$317K$635K$952K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$260K$520K$780K$780K$780K$780K$780K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K
Cumulative$0$919K$1.8M$2.7M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.6M$-4.6M-7.2%
Year 1$-4.7M+$2.2M$-2.5M-3.9%
Year 2$-4.9M+$3.4M$-1.5M-2.4%
Year 3$-5.0M+$3.4M$-1.7M-2.6%
Year 4$-5.2M+$3.4M$-1.8M-2.8%
Year 5$-5.3M+$3.4M$-2.0M-3.1%
$-46.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-21.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.4M
Value Created
$-2.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.3M
Organic Growth
$33.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$641K$962K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$635K$952K$1.3M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$390K$585K$780K$936K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$31K$41K$49K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.2%-11.4%-1.8%11.3%
P34
Net-to-Gross18.4%29.3%38.4%47.5%
P8
Occupancy45.9%26.1%37.3%58.3%
P61
Rev/Bed$2.3M$413K$1.1M$2.1M
P80
Exp/Bed$2.5M$398K$1.1M$2.1M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML