Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINGS DAUGHTERS MED CENTER OHIO 2026-04-26 05:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINGS DAUGHTERS MED CENTER OHIO
CCN 360361 | OH | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $11.5M → Pro Forma $13.4M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$708K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$721K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$714K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$439K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$721K$721K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$694K$20K$714K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$111K$328K$439K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$180K$361K$541K$721K$721K$721K$721K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$179K$357K$536K$714K$714K$714K$714K
A/R Days Reduction$0$146K$293K$439K$439K$439K$439K$439K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$517K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.5M$11.5M31.8%
Year 1$11.8M+$1.3M$13.1M36.3%
Year 2$12.2M+$1.9M$14.1M39.0%
Year 3$12.6M+$1.9M$14.4M40.1%
Year 4$12.9M+$1.9M$14.8M41.1%
Year 5$13.3M+$1.9M$15.2M42.2%
$114.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$167.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$52.5M
Value Created
$15.2M
Exit EBITDA
$18.3M
Organic Growth
$19.0M
RCM Value Creation
$15.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$361K$541K$721K$866K
Denial Rate Reductio$357K$536K$714K$857K
A/R Days Reduction$219K$329K$439K$527K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$949K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin31.8%-10.7%13.0%34.8%
P64
Net-to-Gross27.8%27.5%30.0%39.5%
P27
Occupancy11.6%23.6%31.0%53.9%
P9
Rev/Bed$3.6M$1.0M$2.0M$2.6M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.5M$894K$1.5M$2.3M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML