Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOIN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOIN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 360360 | OH | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.2M → Pro Forma $10.2M (+$13.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$256.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$13.5M
Modeled Uplift
$10.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.2M (vs $13.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$164K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.1M$5.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.9M$141K$5.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$786K$2.3M$3.1M$9.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$164K$164K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$82K$164K$164K$164K$164K$164K$164K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.3M$10.9M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.2x
Headroom (turns)
141%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 141% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.7x, adding 101.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.2M$-3.2M-1.3%
Year 1$-3.3M+$9.0M$5.6M2.2%
Year 2$-3.4M+$13.5M$10.0M3.9%
Year 3$-3.5M+$13.5M$9.9M3.9%
Year 4$-3.6M+$13.5M$9.8M3.8%
Year 5$-3.8M+$13.5M$9.7M3.8%
$-32.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$107.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$139.4M
Value Created
$9.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.2M
Organic Growth
$134.8M
RCM Value Creation
$9.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$82K$123K$164K$197K
Total$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$16.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 102 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.3%-11.7%1.4%8.2%
P43
Net-to-Gross18.8%21.2%28.2%35.2%
P15
Occupancy85.0%43.5%55.2%69.8%
P94
Rev/Bed$2.1M$479K$1.2M$1.6M
P89
Exp/Bed$2.2M$392K$1.1M$1.6M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML