Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DILEY RIDGE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:44 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DILEY RIDGE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 360358 | OH | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $10.9M → Pro Forma $12.3M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$996K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$833K
Risk-Adjusted
-$533K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$519K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$514K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$316K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$519K$519K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$500K$14K$514K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$80K$236K$316K$996K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$130K$260K$389K$519K$519K$519K$519K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$129K$257K$386K$514K$514K$514K$514K
A/R Days Reduction$0$105K$211K$316K$316K$316K$316K$316K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$372K$744K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 0.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.9M$10.9M42.1%
Year 1$11.3M+$910K$12.2M46.9%
Year 2$11.6M+$1.4M$13.0M50.0%
Year 3$12.0M+$1.4M$13.3M51.3%
Year 4$12.3M+$1.4M$13.7M52.7%
Year 5$12.7M+$1.4M$14.0M54.1%
$109.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$154.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.1M
Value Created
$14.0M
Exit EBITDA
$17.4M
Organic Growth
$13.7M
RCM Value Creation
$14.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$260K$389K$519K$623K
Denial Rate Reductio$257K$386K$514K$617K
A/R Days Reduction$158K$237K$316K$379K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$17K$20K
Total$683K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin42.1%-10.7%13.0%34.8%
P91
Net-to-Gross28.1%27.5%30.0%39.5%
P36
Occupancy10.3%23.6%31.0%53.9%
P0
Rev/Bed$2.6M$1.0M$2.0M$2.6M
P73
Exp/Bed$1.5M$894K$1.5M$2.3M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML