Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEST CHESTER HOSPITAL LLC 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEST CHESTER HOSPITAL LLC
CCN 360354 | OH | 163 beds | Current EBITDA $-39.3M → Pro Forma $-22.5M (+$16.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$318.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-39.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-22.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$16.8M
Modeled Uplift
$12.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.0M (vs $16.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$204K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$175K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$978K$2.9M$3.9M$12.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$204K$204K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$102K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.1M$13.6M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-39.3M$-39.3M-12.3%
Year 1$-40.5M+$11.2M$-29.3M-9.2%
Year 2$-41.7M+$16.8M$-24.9M-7.8%
Year 3$-43.0M+$16.8M$-26.2M-8.2%
Year 4$-44.2M+$16.8M$-27.5M-8.6%
Year 5$-45.6M+$16.8M$-28.8M-9.0%
$-393.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-316.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$76.2M
Value Created
$-28.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-62.6M
Organic Growth
$167.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-28.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$102K$153K$204K$245K
Total$8.4M$12.6M$16.8M$20.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.3%-9.9%0.3%7.0%
P23
Net-to-Gross21.8%21.8%27.0%32.2%
P23
Occupancy69.5%46.1%56.0%70.3%
P73
Rev/Bed$2.0M$907K$1.3M$1.6M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.2M$644K$1.2M$1.6M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML