Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DUBLIN METHODIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DUBLIN METHODIST HOSPITAL
CCN 360348 | OH | 110 beds | Current EBITDA $94.8M → Pro Forma $112.3M (+$17.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$333.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$94.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$112.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$17.6M
Modeled Uplift
$13.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.0M (vs $17.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$214K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.7M$6.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.4M$184K$6.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.0M$4.1M$12.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$214K$214K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$107K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Cumulative$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.2M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$94.8M$94.8M28.4%
Year 1$97.6M+$11.7M$109.3M32.7%
Year 2$100.5M+$17.6M$118.1M35.4%
Year 3$103.5M+$17.6M$121.1M36.3%
Year 4$106.6M+$17.6M$124.2M37.2%
Year 5$109.8M+$17.6M$127.4M38.2%
$947.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.40B
Exit EV (11x)
$454.0M
Value Created
$127.4M
Exit EBITDA
$150.9M
Organic Growth
$175.7M
RCM Value Creation
$127.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.0M$4.1M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$107K$160K$214K$256K
Total$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$21.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 101 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.4%-12.4%1.4%8.2%
P96
Net-to-Gross35.3%21.8%28.1%35.3%
P73
Occupancy72.8%43.1%54.6%69.2%
P80
Rev/Bed$3.0M$442K$1.2M$1.6M
P97
Exp/Bed$2.2M$391K$1.1M$1.6M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML