Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT CARMEL NEW ALBANY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT CARMEL NEW ALBANY HOSPITAL
CCN 360266 | OH | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $16.5M → Pro Forma $21.4M (+$5.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$94.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$5.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.9M (vs $5.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$60K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$52K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$289K$857K$1.1M$3.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$60K$60K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$471K$941K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$466K$932K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$382K$764K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.5M$16.5M17.5%
Year 1$17.0M+$3.3M$20.3M21.6%
Year 2$17.5M+$5.0M$22.4M23.8%
Year 3$18.0M+$5.0M$23.0M24.4%
Year 4$18.6M+$5.0M$23.5M25.0%
Year 5$19.1M+$5.0M$24.1M25.6%
$164.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$264.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$99.9M
Value Created
$24.1M
Exit EBITDA
$26.3M
Organic Growth
$49.5M
RCM Value Creation
$24.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$941K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$932K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$573K$859K$1.1M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$45K$60K$72K
Total$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$5.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.5%-14.6%1.3%9.3%
P89
Net-to-Gross27.9%23.5%32.2%44.2%
P34
Occupancy10.2%31.6%50.7%67.5%
P0
Rev/Bed$1.6M$342K$592K$1.4M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.3M$315K$551K$1.5M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML