Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INSTITUTE FOR ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY 2026-04-26 06:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INSTITUTE FOR ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY
CCN 360263 | OH | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $22.0M → Pro Forma $24.9M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$55.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$945K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$677K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$171K$506K$677K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$278K$556K$834K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$275K$550K$826K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$226K$451K$677K$677K$677K$677K$677K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$797K$1.6M$2.4M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.0M$22.0M39.5%
Year 1$22.6M+$2.0M$24.6M44.2%
Year 2$23.3M+$2.9M$26.2M47.2%
Year 3$24.0M+$2.9M$26.9M48.4%
Year 4$24.7M+$2.9M$27.6M49.7%
Year 5$25.5M+$2.9M$28.4M51.1%
$219.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$312.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$92.6M
Value Created
$28.4M
Exit EBITDA
$35.0M
Organic Growth
$29.3M
RCM Value Creation
$28.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$556K$834K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$550K$826K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$338K$507K$677K$812K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$43K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin39.5%-15.5%-3.3%19.1%
P92
Net-to-Gross27.2%27.7%31.8%44.8%
P21
Occupancy24.1%20.7%35.3%45.1%
P29
Rev/Bed$4.6M$321K$1.5M$2.3M
P92
Exp/Bed$2.8M$444K$1.3M$2.4M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML