Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GLENBEIGH HEALTH SOURCES 2026-04-26 14:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GLENBEIGH HEALTH SOURCES
CCN 360245 | OH | 114 beds | Current EBITDA $3.0M → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$941K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$849K
Risk-Adjusted
-$442K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$491K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$486K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$299K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$491K$491K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$472K$13K$486K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$75K$223K$299K$941K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$123K$245K$368K$491K$491K$491K$491K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$121K$243K$364K$486K$486K$486K$486K
A/R Days Reduction$0$100K$199K$299K$299K$299K$299K$299K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$352K$703K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.0M$3.0M12.1%
Year 1$3.1M+$861K$3.9M16.0%
Year 2$3.2M+$1.3M$4.4M18.1%
Year 3$3.3M+$1.3M$4.5M18.5%
Year 4$3.3M+$1.3M$4.6M18.9%
Year 5$3.5M+$1.3M$4.7M19.3%
$29.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$52.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.4M
Value Created
$4.7M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$12.9M
RCM Value Creation
$4.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$245K$368K$491K$589K
Denial Rate Reductio$243K$364K$486K$583K
A/R Days Reduction$149K$224K$299K$358K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$646K$968K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 101 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.1%-12.4%1.4%8.2%
P81
Net-to-Gross30.7%21.8%28.2%35.4%
P62
Occupancy53.1%43.3%54.8%69.5%
P46
Rev/Bed$215K$432K$1.2M$1.6M
P10
Exp/Bed$189K$370K$1.1M$1.6M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML