Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARTHUR G JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARTHUR G JAMES CANCER HOSPITAL
CCN 360242 | OH | 356 beds | Current EBITDA $408.8M → Pro Forma $511.3M (+$102.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.95B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$408.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$102.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$511.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$74.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$102.4M
Modeled Uplift
$78.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$23.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $78.6M (vs $102.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$38.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$38.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$23.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.2M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$102.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$38.9M$38.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$37.5M$1.1M$38.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6.0M$17.7M$23.7M$74.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$9.7M$19.5M$29.2M$38.9M$38.9M$38.9M$38.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$9.6M$19.3M$28.9M$38.6M$38.6M$38.6M$38.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$7.9M$15.8M$23.7M$23.7M$23.7M$23.7M$23.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$623K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Cumulative$0$27.9M$55.8M$83.1M$102.4M$102.4M$102.4M$102.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $102.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$408.8M$408.8M21.0%
Year 1$421.1M+$68.3M$489.4M25.1%
Year 2$433.7M+$102.4M$536.1M27.5%
Year 3$446.7M+$102.4M$549.2M28.2%
Year 4$460.1M+$102.4M$562.6M28.9%
Year 5$473.9M+$102.4M$576.4M29.6%
$4.09B
Entry EV (10x)
$6.34B
Exit EV (11x)
$2.25B
Value Created
$576.4M
Exit EBITDA
$651.1M
Organic Growth
$1.02B
RCM Value Creation
$576.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$19.5M$29.2M$38.9M$46.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$19.3M$28.9M$38.6M$46.3M
A/R Days Reduction$11.8M$17.8M$23.7M$28.4M
Clean Claim Rate$623K$935K$1.2M$1.5M
Total$51.2M$76.8M$102.4M$122.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.0%-6.6%-0.3%4.7%
P98
Net-to-Gross39.5%21.7%27.7%32.2%
P89
Occupancy81.8%56.1%65.0%76.3%
P86
Rev/Bed$5.5M$1.3M$1.6M$2.2M
P96
Exp/Bed$4.3M$1.2M$1.7M$2.2M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML