Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 360210 | OH | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $24.2M → Pro Forma $31.9M (+$7.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$146.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$24.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$7.7M
Modeled Uplift
$5.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.0M (vs $7.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$94K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$81K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$450K$1.3M$1.8M$5.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$94K$94K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$734K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$726K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$595K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$47K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$24.2M$24.2M16.5%
Year 1$24.9M+$5.1M$30.1M20.5%
Year 2$25.7M+$7.7M$33.4M22.8%
Year 3$26.4M+$7.7M$34.2M23.3%
Year 4$27.2M+$7.7M$35.0M23.8%
Year 5$28.0M+$7.7M$35.8M24.4%
$241.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$393.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$151.5M
Value Created
$35.8M
Exit EBITDA
$38.5M
Organic Growth
$77.2M
RCM Value Creation
$35.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$893K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$47K$70K$94K$113K
Total$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.5%-14.6%1.3%9.3%
P87
Net-to-Gross36.6%23.5%32.2%44.2%
P62
Occupancy33.2%31.6%50.7%67.5%
P28
Rev/Bed$2.4M$342K$592K$1.4M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.0M$315K$551K$1.5M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML