Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UH GEAUGA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UH GEAUGA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 360192 | OH | 106 beds | Current EBITDA $12.7M → Pro Forma $22.4M (+$9.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$183.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$9.6M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $9.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$117K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.7M$3.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.5M$101K$3.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$562K$1.7M$2.2M$7.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$117K$117K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$917K$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$907K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$744K$1.5M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$59K$117K$117K$117K$117K$117K$117K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.8M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.4x
9.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x
10.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
11.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
12.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.7M$12.7M6.9%
Year 1$13.1M+$6.4M$19.5M10.7%
Year 2$13.5M+$9.6M$23.1M12.6%
Year 3$13.9M+$9.6M$23.6M12.8%
Year 4$14.3M+$9.6M$24.0M13.1%
Year 5$14.8M+$9.6M$24.4M13.3%
$127.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$268.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$141.1M
Value Created
$24.4M
Exit EBITDA
$20.3M
Organic Growth
$96.4M
RCM Value Creation
$24.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$59K$88K$117K$141K
Total$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 101 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.9%-12.4%1.4%8.2%
P68
Net-to-Gross26.5%21.8%28.1%35.4%
P42
Occupancy76.8%43.3%54.8%69.2%
P85
Rev/Bed$1.7M$429K$1.1M$1.6M
P80
Exp/Bed$1.6M$370K$1.1M$1.6M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML