Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MADISON HEALTH 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MADISON HEALTH
CCN 360189 | OH | 45 beds | Current EBITDA $8.4M → Pro Forma $11.6M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$61.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$742K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$187K$555K$742K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$305K$610K$915K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$302K$604K$906K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$247K$495K$742K$742K$742K$742K$742K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$874K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.4M$8.4M13.8%
Year 1$8.6M+$2.1M$10.8M17.7%
Year 2$8.9M+$3.2M$12.1M19.9%
Year 3$9.2M+$3.2M$12.4M20.3%
Year 4$9.4M+$3.2M$12.7M20.8%
Year 5$9.7M+$3.2M$12.9M21.2%
$83.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$142.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$58.4M
Value Created
$12.9M
Exit EBITDA
$13.4M
Organic Growth
$32.1M
RCM Value Creation
$12.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$610K$915K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$604K$906K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$371K$556K$742K$890K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$29K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 116 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.8%-12.7%-1.6%10.3%
P78
Net-to-Gross31.5%26.1%36.4%45.4%
P35
Occupancy19.2%27.0%38.7%62.7%
P11
Rev/Bed$1.4M$362K$968K$1.9M
P65
Exp/Bed$1.2M$365K$902K$1.9M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML