Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPH HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 13:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPH HEALTH CENTER
CCN 360161 | OH | 135 beds | Current EBITDA $11.3M → Pro Forma $21.5M (+$10.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$194.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$10.2M
Modeled Uplift
$7.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.4M (vs $10.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$124K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.9M$3.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.7M$107K$3.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$596K$1.8M$2.4M$7.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$124K$124K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$971K$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$961K$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$788K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$62K$124K$124K$124K$124K$124K$124K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.3M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x
9.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x
10.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x
11.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
12.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.1x
Headroom (turns)
32%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 32% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.4x, adding 4.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.3M$11.3M5.8%
Year 1$11.7M+$6.8M$18.5M9.5%
Year 2$12.0M+$10.2M$22.2M11.4%
Year 3$12.4M+$10.2M$22.6M11.6%
Year 4$12.7M+$10.2M$22.9M11.8%
Year 5$13.1M+$10.2M$23.3M12.0%
$113.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$256.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$143.5M
Value Created
$23.3M
Exit EBITDA
$18.0M
Organic Growth
$102.2M
RCM Value Creation
$23.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$62K$93K$124K$149K
Total$5.1M$7.7M$10.2M$12.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.8%-12.3%0.2%7.3%
P68
Net-to-Gross18.9%21.0%26.9%32.5%
P16
Occupancy77.1%43.6%55.5%69.5%
P83
Rev/Bed$1.4M$586K$1.2M$1.5M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.4M$396K$1.2M$1.6M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML