Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADENA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADENA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 360159 | OH | 209 beds | Current EBITDA $16.4M → Pro Forma $41.2M (+$24.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$470.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$41.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$24.8M
Modeled Uplift
$17.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.2M (vs $24.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$301K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.4M$9.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.1M$259K$9.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.3M$5.7M$18.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$301K$301K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$151K$301K$301K$301K$301K$301K$301K
Cumulative$0$6.7M$13.5M$20.1M$24.8M$24.8M$24.8M$24.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x
9.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
10.0x65% / 12.4x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x
11.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
12.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
48%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 48% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.4M$16.4M3.5%
Year 1$16.9M+$16.5M$33.4M7.1%
Year 2$17.4M+$24.8M$42.2M9.0%
Year 3$17.9M+$24.8M$42.7M9.1%
Year 4$18.5M+$24.8M$43.2M9.2%
Year 5$19.0M+$24.8M$43.8M9.3%
$164.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$481.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$317.5M
Value Created
$43.8M
Exit EBITDA
$26.1M
Organic Growth
$247.6M
RCM Value Creation
$43.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.7M$7.1M$9.4M$11.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
Clean Claim Rate$151K$226K$301K$361K
Total$12.4M$18.6M$24.8M$29.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.5%-5.7%1.4%7.8%
P61
Net-to-Gross26.6%21.3%26.7%30.7%
P49
Occupancy59.5%50.2%59.3%75.7%
P51
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.0M$1.4M$1.9M
P89
Exp/Bed$2.2M$941K$1.4M$1.8M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML