Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 360156 | OH | 31 beds | Current EBITDA $3.7M → Pro Forma $7.9M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$79.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$973K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$245K$727K$973K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$400K$799K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$396K$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$324K$649K$973K$973K$973K$973K$973K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.3x
9.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x
10.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.2x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
11.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
12.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
39%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 39% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.7M$3.7M4.6%
Year 1$3.8M+$2.8M$6.6M8.2%
Year 2$3.9M+$4.2M$8.1M10.1%
Year 3$4.0M+$4.2M$8.2M10.3%
Year 4$4.1M+$4.2M$8.3M10.4%
Year 5$4.2M+$4.2M$8.4M10.6%
$36.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$92.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$56.3M
Value Created
$8.4M
Exit EBITDA
$5.8M
Organic Growth
$42.1M
RCM Value Creation
$8.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$799K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$486K$730K$973K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$38K$51K$61K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.6%-11.1%-1.7%12.0%
P60
Net-to-Gross27.6%29.1%38.1%47.4%
P21
Occupancy36.8%26.1%37.5%63.7%
P44
Rev/Bed$2.6M$422K$1.1M$2.1M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.5M$391K$979K$2.1M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML