Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL
CCN 360152 | OH | 173 beds | Current EBITDA $4.5M → Pro Forma $20.7M (+$16.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$309.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$20.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$16.3M
Modeled Uplift
$11.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.5M (vs $16.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$198K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.2M$6.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.9M$170K$6.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$948K$2.8M$3.8M$11.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$198K$198K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$99K$198K$198K$198K$198K$198K$198K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.9M$13.2M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x100% / 31.7x104% / 35.6x109% / 39.5x111% / 41.4x113% / 43.4x
9.0x94% / 27.8x99% / 31.3x103% / 34.7x105% / 36.5x107% / 38.2x
10.0x90% / 24.7x94% / 27.8x99% / 30.9x101% / 32.5x102% / 34.0x
11.0x86% / 22.2x90% / 25.0x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x
12.0x82% / 20.1x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.2x93% / 26.5x94% / 27.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.7x
Headroom (turns)
72%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 72% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.8x, adding 6.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.5M$4.5M1.5%
Year 1$4.6M+$10.8M$15.5M5.0%
Year 2$4.8M+$16.3M$21.0M6.8%
Year 3$4.9M+$16.3M$21.2M6.8%
Year 4$5.1M+$16.3M$21.3M6.9%
Year 5$5.2M+$16.3M$21.5M6.9%
$44.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$236.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$191.2M
Value Created
$21.5M
Exit EBITDA
$7.2M
Organic Growth
$162.6M
RCM Value Creation
$21.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$99K$148K$198K$237K
Total$8.1M$12.2M$16.3M$19.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-9.8%0.5%7.0%
P53
Net-to-Gross26.2%21.5%26.9%30.8%
P43
Occupancy67.3%49.0%57.0%71.4%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.8M$954K$1.3M$1.6M
P78
Exp/Bed$1.8M$682K$1.3M$1.6M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML