Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARIETTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 360147 | OH | 188 beds | Current EBITDA $-58.8M → Pro Forma $-33.8M (+$25.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$475.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-58.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-33.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$25.0M
Modeled Uplift
$17.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.7M (vs $25.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$305K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.5M$9.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.2M$262K$9.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.3M$5.8M$18.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$305K$305K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$152K$305K$305K$305K$305K$305K$305K
Cumulative$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.3M$25.0M$25.0M$25.0M$25.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-58.8M$-58.8M-12.4%
Year 1$-60.6M+$16.7M$-43.9M-9.2%
Year 2$-62.4M+$25.0M$-37.3M-7.8%
Year 3$-64.3M+$25.0M$-39.2M-8.2%
Year 4$-66.2M+$25.0M$-41.1M-8.6%
Year 5$-68.2M+$25.0M$-43.1M-9.1%
$-588.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-474.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$113.5M
Value Created
$-43.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-93.7M
Organic Growth
$250.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-43.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.7M$7.1M$9.4M$11.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Clean Claim Rate$152K$228K$305K$365K
Total$12.5M$18.8M$25.0M$30.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.4%-8.9%1.0%7.1%
P19
Net-to-Gross30.1%21.8%26.9%31.8%
P70
Occupancy62.6%50.1%57.2%72.5%
P62
Rev/Bed$2.5M$976K$1.4M$1.7M
P93
Exp/Bed$2.8M$888K$1.3M$1.7M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML