Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
CCN 360134 | OH | 361 beds | Current EBITDA $30.9M → Pro Forma $76.7M (+$45.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$870.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$30.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$45.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$76.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$33.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$45.8M
Modeled Uplift
$33.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $33.1M (vs $45.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$557K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$45.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.4M$17.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$16.8M$479K$17.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.7M$7.9M$10.6M$33.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$557K$557K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.4M$8.7M$13.1M$17.4M$17.4M$17.4M$17.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.9M$17.2M$17.2M$17.2M$17.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.5M$7.1M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$279K$557K$557K$557K$557K$557K$557K
Cumulative$0$12.5M$25.0M$37.1M$45.8M$45.8M$45.8M$45.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $45.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x74% / 16.1x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.5x
9.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x
10.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x
11.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x
12.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
48%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 48% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$30.9M$30.9M3.5%
Year 1$31.8M+$30.5M$62.3M7.2%
Year 2$32.7M+$45.8M$78.6M9.0%
Year 3$33.7M+$45.8M$79.5M9.1%
Year 4$34.7M+$45.8M$80.6M9.2%
Year 5$35.8M+$45.8M$81.6M9.4%
$308.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$897.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$588.9M
Value Created
$81.6M
Exit EBITDA
$49.2M
Organic Growth
$458.1M
RCM Value Creation
$81.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.7M$13.1M$17.4M$20.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.6M$12.9M$17.2M$20.7M
A/R Days Reduction$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$12.7M
Clean Claim Rate$279K$418K$557K$669K
Total$22.9M$34.4M$45.8M$55.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.5%-7.7%-0.3%3.5%
P73
Net-to-Gross32.8%21.4%27.7%32.6%
P78
Occupancy79.2%56.4%65.0%76.1%
P85
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.3M$1.7M$2.3M
P80
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.3M$1.7M$2.2M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML