Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KETTERING HEALTH DAYTON 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KETTERING HEALTH DAYTON
CCN 360133 | OH | 317 beds | Current EBITDA $21.9M → Pro Forma $57.0M (+$35.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$667.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$21.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$57.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$35.1M
Modeled Uplift
$23.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.8M (vs $35.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$427K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.4M$13.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.9M$367K$13.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.1M$8.1M$25.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$427K$427K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$214K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Cumulative$0$9.6M$19.1M$28.5M$35.1M$35.1M$35.1M$35.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 16.9x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.6x88% / 23.7x
9.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
10.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
11.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
12.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
50%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 50% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$21.9M$21.9M3.3%
Year 1$22.6M+$23.4M$46.0M6.9%
Year 2$23.2M+$35.1M$58.4M8.7%
Year 3$23.9M+$35.1M$59.1M8.8%
Year 4$24.7M+$35.1M$59.8M9.0%
Year 5$25.4M+$35.1M$60.5M9.1%
$219.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$665.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$446.7M
Value Created
$60.5M
Exit EBITDA
$34.9M
Organic Growth
$351.2M
RCM Value Creation
$60.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$16.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
Clean Claim Rate$214K$320K$427K$513K
Total$17.6M$26.3M$35.1M$42.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.3%-6.8%0.0%6.1%
P67
Net-to-Gross20.6%21.2%26.8%30.1%
P20
Occupancy57.2%52.3%62.4%75.9%
P38
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P78
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.1M$1.5M$2.1M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML