Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDCENTRAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDCENTRAL HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 360118 | OH | 240 beds | Current EBITDA $778K → Pro Forma $20.9M (+$20.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$382.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$778K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$20.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$20.1M
Modeled Uplift
$14.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.0M (vs $20.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$245K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.7M$7.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.4M$210K$7.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$245K$245K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$122K$245K$245K$245K$245K$245K$245K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.3M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x187% / 194.3x193% / 216.3x199% / 238.3x202% / 249.2x204% / 260.2x
9.0x180% / 172.4x186% / 191.9x192% / 211.4x194% / 221.2x197% / 230.9x
10.0x174% / 154.8x180% / 172.4x186% / 190.0x188% / 198.7x191% / 207.5x
11.0x169% / 140.5x175% / 156.4x180% / 172.4x183% / 180.4x185% / 188.4x
12.0x164% / 128.5x170% / 143.1x175% / 157.8x178% / 165.1x180% / 172.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$778K$778K0.2%
Year 1$802K+$13.4M$14.2M3.7%
Year 2$826K+$20.1M$21.0M5.5%
Year 3$851K+$20.1M$21.0M5.5%
Year 4$876K+$20.1M$21.0M5.5%
Year 5$902K+$20.1M$21.0M5.5%
$7.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$231.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$223.6M
Value Created
$21.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$201.3M
RCM Value Creation
$21.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$122K$184K$245K$294K
Total$10.1M$15.1M$20.1M$24.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 72 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-5.7%0.5%7.8%
P47
Net-to-Gross30.0%21.0%26.9%30.3%
P71
Occupancy65.8%52.7%60.1%74.9%
P60
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.4M$2.0M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.6M$989K$1.4M$1.9M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML