Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKE HOSPITAL SYSTEM 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKE HOSPITAL SYSTEM
CCN 360098 | OH | 297 beds | Current EBITDA $-65.5M → Pro Forma $-47.5M (+$18.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$342.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-65.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-47.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$18.0M
Modeled Uplift
$11.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.7M (vs $18.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$219K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.8M$6.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.6M$188K$6.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.1M$4.2M$13.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$219K$219K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$110K$219K$219K$219K$219K$219K$219K
Cumulative$0$4.9M$9.8M$14.6M$18.0M$18.0M$18.0M$18.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-65.5M$-65.5M-19.1%
Year 1$-67.4M+$12.0M$-55.4M-16.2%
Year 2$-69.5M+$18.0M$-51.4M-15.0%
Year 3$-71.5M+$18.0M$-53.5M-15.6%
Year 4$-73.7M+$18.0M$-55.7M-16.3%
Year 5$-75.9M+$18.0M$-57.9M-16.9%
$-654.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-636.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.0M
Value Created
$-57.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-104.3M
Organic Growth
$180.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-57.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.1M$4.2M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$110K$164K$219K$263K
Total$9.0M$13.5M$18.0M$21.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 61 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.1%-5.9%0.1%6.5%
P5
Net-to-Gross23.9%21.4%26.8%30.1%
P39
Occupancy50.1%52.8%62.6%75.9%
P18
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$1.6M$2.0M
P19
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML