Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EAST LIVERPOOL CITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EAST LIVERPOOL CITY HOSPITAL
CCN 360096 | OH | 116 beds | Current EBITDA $6.4M → Pro Forma $10.2M (+$3.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$72.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.8M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$878K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$46K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$40K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$221K$656K$878K$2.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$46K$46K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$361K$721K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$357K$714K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$293K$585K$878K$878K$878K$878K$878K
Clean Claim Rate$0$23K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K
Cumulative$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
11.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
12.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.4M$6.4M8.9%
Year 1$6.6M+$2.5M$9.1M12.6%
Year 2$6.8M+$3.8M$10.6M14.7%
Year 3$7.0M+$3.8M$10.8M14.9%
Year 4$7.2M+$3.8M$11.0M15.2%
Year 5$7.4M+$3.8M$11.2M15.5%
$63.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$123.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$59.3M
Value Created
$11.2M
Exit EBITDA
$10.2M
Organic Growth
$37.9M
RCM Value Creation
$11.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$721K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$714K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$439K$658K$878K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$23K$35K$46K$55K
Total$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 103 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.9%-12.3%1.4%8.1%
P76
Net-to-Gross23.4%21.4%28.2%35.3%
P31
Occupancy31.6%43.4%55.0%69.7%
P12
Rev/Bed$622K$453K$1.2M$1.6M
P33
Exp/Bed$567K$381K$1.1M$1.6M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML