Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLANCHARD VALLEY REG. HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLANCHARD VALLEY REG. HEALTH CENTER
CCN 360095 | OH | 152 beds | Current EBITDA $70.8M → Pro Forma $87.1M (+$16.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$310.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$70.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$87.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$16.3M
Modeled Uplift
$11.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.2M (vs $16.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$198K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.2M$6.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.0M$171K$6.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$951K$2.8M$3.8M$11.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$198K$198K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$99K$198K$198K$198K$198K$198K$198K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.9M$13.2M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$70.8M$70.8M22.8%
Year 1$72.9M+$10.9M$83.8M27.0%
Year 2$75.1M+$16.3M$91.4M29.5%
Year 3$77.3M+$16.3M$93.6M30.2%
Year 4$79.6M+$16.3M$96.0M30.9%
Year 5$82.0M+$16.3M$98.4M31.7%
$707.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.08B
Exit EV (11x)
$374.2M
Value Created
$98.4M
Exit EBITDA
$112.7M
Organic Growth
$163.1M
RCM Value Creation
$98.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.7M$6.2M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.6M$6.1M$7.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$99K$149K$198K$238K
Total$8.2M$12.2M$16.3M$19.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.8%-9.7%0.6%7.5%
P94
Net-to-Gross48.4%21.4%27.0%32.4%
P95
Occupancy57.1%45.3%55.8%69.5%
P54
Rev/Bed$2.0M$676K$1.3M$1.6M
P87
Exp/Bed$1.6M$547K$1.2M$1.6M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML