Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDINA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDINA HOSPITAL
CCN 360091 | OH | 148 beds | Current EBITDA $16.2M → Pro Forma $24.9M (+$8.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$166.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$8.8M
Modeled Uplift
$6.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.0M (vs $8.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$106K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.3M$3.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.2M$92K$3.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$511K$1.5M$2.0M$6.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$106K$106K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$832K$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$824K$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$675K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$53K$106K$106K$106K$106K$106K$106K
Cumulative$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
9.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
10.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
11.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.2M$16.2M9.7%
Year 1$16.7M+$5.8M$22.5M13.5%
Year 2$17.2M+$8.8M$25.9M15.6%
Year 3$17.7M+$8.8M$26.4M15.9%
Year 4$18.2M+$8.8M$27.0M16.2%
Year 5$18.8M+$8.8M$27.5M16.5%
$161.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$302.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$140.8M
Value Created
$27.5M
Exit EBITDA
$25.8M
Organic Growth
$87.5M
RCM Value Creation
$27.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$53K$80K$106K$128K
Total$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.7%-9.6%0.5%7.3%
P80
Net-to-Gross28.8%21.6%27.4%33.4%
P58
Occupancy62.5%44.6%55.6%69.2%
P63
Rev/Bed$1.1M$703K$1.3M$1.6M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.0M$548K$1.2M$1.6M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML