Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 360086 | OH | 230 beds | Current EBITDA $-15.3M → Pro Forma $-224K (+$15.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$287.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-15.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-224K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$15.1M
Modeled Uplift
$10.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.8M (vs $15.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$184K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.5M$158K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$882K$2.6M$3.5M$11.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$92K$184K$184K$184K$184K$184K$184K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.3M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-15.3M$-15.3M-5.3%
Year 1$-15.8M+$10.1M$-5.7M-2.0%
Year 2$-16.3M+$15.1M$-1.2M-0.4%
Year 3$-16.8M+$15.1M$-1.6M-0.6%
Year 4$-17.3M+$15.1M$-2.2M-0.7%
Year 5$-17.8M+$15.1M$-2.7M-0.9%
$-153.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-29.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$124.1M
Value Created
$-2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-24.4M
Organic Growth
$151.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$92K$138K$184K$221K
Total$7.6M$11.3M$15.1M$18.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.3%-5.7%0.5%7.8%
P28
Net-to-Gross18.0%21.0%26.7%30.3%
P7
Occupancy74.6%52.1%59.6%75.7%
P73
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.1M$1.4M$2.0M
P35
Exp/Bed$1.3M$969K$1.4M$1.9M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML