Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AULTMAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AULTMAN HOSPITAL
CCN 360084 | OH | 365 beds | Current EBITDA $-32.9M → Pro Forma $-2.1M (+$30.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$586.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-32.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$30.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$30.8M
Modeled Uplift
$21.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.2M (vs $30.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$375K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$30.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.7M$11.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.3M$322K$11.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.3M$7.1M$22.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$375K$375K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.9M$8.8M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$188K$375K$375K$375K$375K$375K$375K
Cumulative$0$8.4M$16.8M$25.0M$30.8M$30.8M$30.8M$30.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $30.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-32.9M$-32.9M-5.6%
Year 1$-33.9M+$20.6M$-13.4M-2.3%
Year 2$-34.9M+$30.8M$-4.1M-0.7%
Year 3$-36.0M+$30.8M$-5.1M-0.9%
Year 4$-37.1M+$30.8M$-6.2M-1.1%
Year 5$-38.2M+$30.8M$-7.3M-1.3%
$-329.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-80.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$248.6M
Value Created
$-7.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-52.4M
Organic Growth
$308.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.9M$8.8M$11.7M$14.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$13.9M
A/R Days Reduction$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$188K$281K$375K$450K
Total$15.4M$23.1M$30.8M$37.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.6%-8.5%-0.5%3.5%
P27
Net-to-Gross32.6%21.3%27.7%32.0%
P77
Occupancy68.8%56.7%65.3%76.2%
P62
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.3M$1.6M$2.2M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.2M$1.7M$2.2M
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML