Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KETTERING HEALTH MAIN CAMPUS 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KETTERING HEALTH MAIN CAMPUS
CCN 360079 | OH | 383 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.0M → Pro Forma $33.0M (+$38.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$722.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$38.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$33.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$27.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$38.0M
Modeled Uplift
$27.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.0M (vs $38.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$463K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$38.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.5M$14.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.9M$397K$14.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.6M$8.8M$27.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$463K$463K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.8M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.7M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.9M$5.9M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$231K$463K$463K$463K$463K$463K$463K
Cumulative$0$10.4M$20.7M$30.8M$38.0M$38.0M$38.0M$38.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $38.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.8x
Headroom (turns)
120%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 120% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.3x, adding 100.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.0M$-5.0M-0.7%
Year 1$-5.2M+$25.3M$20.2M2.8%
Year 2$-5.3M+$38.0M$32.7M4.5%
Year 3$-5.5M+$38.0M$32.5M4.5%
Year 4$-5.7M+$38.0M$32.4M4.5%
Year 5$-5.8M+$38.0M$32.2M4.5%
$-50.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$354.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$404.4M
Value Created
$32.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.0M
Organic Growth
$380.2M
RCM Value Creation
$32.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.2M$10.8M$14.5M$17.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.2M$10.7M$14.3M$17.2M
A/R Days Reduction$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.6M
Clean Claim Rate$231K$347K$463K$555K
Total$19.0M$28.5M$38.0M$45.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.7%-5.4%0.2%3.5%
P41
Net-to-Gross20.9%21.0%26.9%32.6%
P22
Occupancy75.9%57.5%66.7%76.5%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.4M$1.8M$2.3M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML