Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. RITAS MEDICAL CENTER LLC 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. RITAS MEDICAL CENTER LLC
CCN 360066 | OH | 329 beds | Current EBITDA $32.1M → Pro Forma $58.3M (+$26.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$497.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$32.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$26.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$58.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$26.2M
Modeled Uplift
$17.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.7M (vs $26.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$318K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$26.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.0M$10.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.6M$274K$9.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.5M$6.1M$19.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$318K$318K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$159K$318K$318K$318K$318K$318K$318K
Cumulative$0$7.1M$14.3M$21.2M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $26.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.8x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x
9.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
10.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x
11.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
12.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
28%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 28% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$32.1M$32.1M6.5%
Year 1$33.1M+$17.5M$50.5M10.2%
Year 2$34.1M+$26.2M$60.2M12.1%
Year 3$35.1M+$26.2M$61.3M12.3%
Year 4$36.1M+$26.2M$62.3M12.5%
Year 5$37.2M+$26.2M$63.4M12.7%
$321.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$697.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$376.3M
Value Created
$63.4M
Exit EBITDA
$51.1M
Organic Growth
$261.8M
RCM Value Creation
$63.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$11.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$11.8M
A/R Days Reduction$3.0M$4.5M$6.1M$7.3M
Clean Claim Rate$159K$239K$318K$382K
Total$13.1M$19.6M$26.2M$31.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.5%-5.8%0.0%4.7%
P76
Net-to-Gross21.4%21.2%26.8%30.1%
P25
Occupancy59.6%53.2%63.6%76.3%
P43
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.6M$2.1M
P47
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.5M$2.1M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML