Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 360059 | OH | 580 beds | Current EBITDA $-418.2M → Pro Forma $-356.3M (+$61.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.18B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-418.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$61.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-356.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$45.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$61.9M
Modeled Uplift
$40.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$21.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $40.2M (vs $61.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$23.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$23.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$753K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$61.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$23.5M$23.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$22.7M$647K$23.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.6M$10.7M$14.3M$45.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$753K$753K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.9M$11.8M$17.7M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.8M$11.7M$17.5M$23.3M$23.3M$23.3M$23.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$377K$753K$753K$753K$753K$753K$753K
Cumulative$0$16.9M$33.7M$50.2M$61.9M$61.9M$61.9M$61.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $61.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-418.2M$-418.2M-35.5%
Year 1$-430.8M+$41.3M$-389.5M-33.1%
Year 2$-443.7M+$61.9M$-381.8M-32.4%
Year 3$-457.0M+$61.9M$-395.1M-33.6%
Year 4$-470.7M+$61.9M$-408.8M-34.7%
Year 5$-484.8M+$61.9M$-422.9M-35.9%
$-4.18B
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.65B
Exit EV (11x)
$-469.7M
Value Created
$-422.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-666.1M
Organic Growth
$619.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-422.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.8M$17.7M$23.5M$28.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.7M$17.5M$23.3M$28.0M
A/R Days Reduction$7.2M$10.7M$14.3M$17.2M
Clean Claim Rate$377K$565K$753K$904K
Total$31.0M$46.4M$61.9M$74.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-35.5%-11.1%-0.1%6.9%
P0
Net-to-Gross27.7%21.8%27.7%32.6%
P50
Occupancy56.9%64.4%68.7%78.1%
P3
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.3M
P54
Exp/Bed$2.8M$1.4M$2.0M$2.3M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML