Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HEALTH - FAIRFIELD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HEALTH - FAIRFIELD HOSPITAL
CCN 360056 | OH | 196 beds | Current EBITDA $4.4M → Pro Forma $19.1M (+$14.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$278.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$14.7M
Modeled Uplift
$10.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.4M (vs $14.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$179K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.6M$5.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.4M$153K$5.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$856K$2.5M$3.4M$10.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$179K$179K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$89K$179K$179K$179K$179K$179K$179K
Cumulative$0$4.0M$8.0M$11.9M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x97% / 29.4x101% / 33.1x106% / 36.7x108% / 38.5x109% / 40.3x
9.0x92% / 25.8x96% / 29.0x100% / 32.3x102% / 33.9x104% / 35.5x
10.0x87% / 22.9x92% / 25.8x96% / 28.7x98% / 30.2x100% / 31.6x
11.0x83% / 20.5x87% / 23.2x92% / 25.8x93% / 27.1x95% / 28.4x
12.0x79% / 18.5x84% / 21.0x88% / 23.4x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.5x
Headroom (turns)
70%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 70% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.0x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.4M$4.4M1.6%
Year 1$4.6M+$9.8M$14.3M5.1%
Year 2$4.7M+$14.7M$19.4M6.9%
Year 3$4.8M+$14.7M$19.5M7.0%
Year 4$5.0M+$14.7M$19.7M7.0%
Year 5$5.1M+$14.7M$19.8M7.1%
$44.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$217.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$173.6M
Value Created
$19.8M
Exit EBITDA
$7.1M
Organic Growth
$146.7M
RCM Value Creation
$19.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$89K$134K$179K$214K
Total$7.3M$11.0M$14.7M$17.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.6%-8.1%1.0%7.1%
P53
Net-to-Gross20.3%21.5%26.9%31.8%
P18
Occupancy71.2%50.1%57.2%72.5%
P72
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.4M$1.8M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.4M$926K$1.4M$1.8M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML