Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIV OF TOLEDO MEDL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIV OF TOLEDO MEDL CENTER
CCN 360048 | OH | 212 beds | Current EBITDA $-123.6M → Pro Forma $-108.1M (+$15.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$294.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-123.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-108.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$15.5M
Modeled Uplift
$10.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.4M (vs $15.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$189K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.9M$5.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$162K$5.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$904K$2.7M$3.6M$11.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$189K$189K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$94K$189K$189K$189K$189K$189K$189K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.4M$12.6M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-123.6M$-123.6M-41.9%
Year 1$-127.3M+$10.3M$-117.0M-39.7%
Year 2$-131.1M+$15.5M$-115.6M-39.2%
Year 3$-135.0M+$15.5M$-119.5M-40.6%
Year 4$-139.1M+$15.5M$-123.6M-42.0%
Year 5$-143.3M+$15.5M$-127.8M-43.4%
$-1.24B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.41B
Exit EV (11x)
$-169.6M
Value Created
$-127.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-196.8M
Organic Growth
$155.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-127.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$94K$141K$189K$226K
Total$7.7M$11.6M$15.5M$18.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-41.9%-5.7%1.4%7.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross19.4%21.3%26.7%31.1%
P11
Occupancy52.8%51.9%59.3%75.7%
P27
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.4M$1.9M
P47
Exp/Bed$2.0M$941K$1.4M$1.9M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML