Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KNOX COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KNOX COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 360040 | OH | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $-32.7M → Pro Forma $-22.4M (+$10.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$196.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-32.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-22.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$10.3M
Modeled Uplift
$7.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.4M (vs $10.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$125K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.9M$3.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$108K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$601K$1.8M$2.4M$7.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$125K$125K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$980K$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$970K$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$795K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$63K$125K$125K$125K$125K$125K$125K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-32.7M$-32.7M-16.7%
Year 1$-33.7M+$6.9M$-26.8M-13.7%
Year 2$-34.7M+$10.3M$-24.4M-12.4%
Year 3$-35.7M+$10.3M$-25.4M-13.0%
Year 4$-36.8M+$10.3M$-26.5M-13.5%
Year 5$-37.9M+$10.3M$-27.6M-14.1%
$-327.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-303.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.5M
Value Created
$-27.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-52.1M
Organic Growth
$103.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-27.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$63K$94K$125K$151K
Total$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$12.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 95 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.7%-14.9%1.4%9.4%
P19
Net-to-Gross36.5%23.4%32.1%43.0%
P62
Occupancy57.5%32.7%52.8%67.3%
P59
Rev/Bed$3.1M$309K$592K$1.4M
P99
Exp/Bed$3.6M$312K$551K$1.5M
P99

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML