Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JOINT TOWNSHIP DISTRICT MEMORIAL HOS 2026-04-26 13:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JOINT TOWNSHIP DISTRICT MEMORIAL HOS
CCN 360032 | OH | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $8.9M → Pro Forma $13.9M (+$5.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$95.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$5.0M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $5.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$61K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$53K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$293K$870K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$61K$61K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$478K$956K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$473K$946K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$388K$775K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$61K$61K$61K$61K$61K$61K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
9.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.9M$8.9M9.3%
Year 1$9.1M+$3.4M$12.5M13.1%
Year 2$9.4M+$5.0M$14.4M15.1%
Year 3$9.7M+$5.0M$14.7M15.4%
Year 4$10.0M+$5.0M$15.0M15.7%
Year 5$10.3M+$5.0M$15.3M16.0%
$88.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$168.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$79.7M
Value Created
$15.3M
Exit EBITDA
$14.1M
Organic Growth
$50.3M
RCM Value Creation
$15.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$956K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$946K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$581K$872K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$46K$61K$73K
Total$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.3%-11.1%-1.7%11.3%
P69
Net-to-Gross50.2%29.3%38.1%47.5%
P82
Occupancy34.9%26.1%38.3%59.9%
P38
Rev/Bed$2.9M$387K$1.1M$2.1M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.6M$383K$959K$2.1M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML