Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WOOD COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WOOD COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 360029 | OH | 99 beds | Current EBITDA $224K → Pro Forma $5.8M (+$5.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$105.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$224K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$5.6M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $5.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$68K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$58K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$325K$964K$1.3M$4.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$68K$68K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$530K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$524K$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$430K$859K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$34K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x185% / 187.1x191% / 208.3x197% / 229.4x199% / 240.0x202% / 250.6x
9.0x178% / 166.0x184% / 184.8x190% / 203.6x192% / 213.0x195% / 222.4x
10.0x172% / 149.1x178% / 166.0x183% / 182.9x186% / 191.4x188% / 199.8x
11.0x167% / 135.2x173% / 150.6x178% / 166.0x181% / 173.7x183% / 181.4x
12.0x162% / 123.7x168% / 137.8x173% / 151.9x176% / 158.9x178% / 166.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$224K$224K0.2%
Year 1$231K+$3.7M$3.9M3.7%
Year 2$238K+$5.6M$5.8M5.5%
Year 3$245K+$5.6M$5.8M5.5%
Year 4$252K+$5.6M$5.8M5.5%
Year 5$260K+$5.6M$5.8M5.5%
$2.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$64.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$61.9M
Value Created
$5.8M
Exit EBITDA
$357K
Organic Growth
$55.7M
RCM Value Creation
$5.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$645K$967K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$34K$51K$68K$81K
Total$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-12.7%1.4%8.1%
P48
Net-to-Gross44.2%22.1%28.5%36.4%
P86
Occupancy17.8%40.1%53.3%67.3%
P2
Rev/Bed$1.1M$402K$1.1M$1.5M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.1M$352K$1.1M$1.6M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML