Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AKRON GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AKRON GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 360027 | OH | 401 beds | Current EBITDA $101.2M → Pro Forma $141.9M (+$40.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$773.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$101.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$141.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$40.7M
Modeled Uplift
$28.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.7M (vs $40.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$495K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.5M$15.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.9M$426K$15.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.0M$9.4M$29.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$495K$495K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.6M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.3M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$248K$495K$495K$495K$495K$495K$495K
Cumulative$0$11.1M$22.2M$33.0M$40.7M$40.7M$40.7M$40.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$101.2M$101.2M13.1%
Year 1$104.2M+$27.1M$131.4M17.0%
Year 2$107.3M+$40.7M$148.0M19.1%
Year 3$110.6M+$40.7M$151.3M19.5%
Year 4$113.9M+$40.7M$154.6M20.0%
Year 5$117.3M+$40.7M$158.0M20.4%
$1.01B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.74B
Exit EV (11x)
$726.2M
Value Created
$158.0M
Exit EBITDA
$161.2M
Organic Growth
$407.1M
RCM Value Creation
$158.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.7M$11.6M$15.5M$18.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$18.4M
A/R Days Reduction$4.7M$7.1M$9.4M$11.3M
Clean Claim Rate$248K$371K$495K$594K
Total$20.4M$30.5M$40.7M$48.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.1%-6.1%0.2%6.0%
P89
Net-to-Gross27.6%21.3%27.7%32.6%
P47
Occupancy75.7%59.1%67.6%77.3%
P67
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.4M$1.8M$2.3M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML