Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL ANDERSON 2026-04-26 06:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL ANDERSON
CCN 360001 | OH | 171 beds | Current EBITDA $40K → Pro Forma $12.7M (+$12.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$239.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$40K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$12.6M
Modeled Uplift
$9.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.2M (vs $12.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$153K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.8M$4.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.6M$132K$4.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$736K$2.2M$2.9M$9.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$153K$153K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$972K$1.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$77K$153K$153K$153K$153K$153K$153K
Cumulative$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.2M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x371% / 2310.1x381% / 2567.1x390% / 2824.2x394% / 2952.7x399% / 3081.2x
9.0x360% / 2053.1x370% / 2281.5x379% / 2510.0x383% / 2624.3x387% / 2738.5x
10.0x350% / 1847.4x360% / 2053.1x369% / 2258.7x373% / 2361.5x377% / 2464.3x
11.0x342% / 1679.2x351% / 1866.1x360% / 2053.1x364% / 2146.5x368% / 2240.0x
12.0x334% / 1539.0x343% / 1710.3x352% / 1881.7x356% / 1967.4x360% / 2053.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.5x
Headroom (turns)
100%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 100% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.0x, adding 8.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$40K$40K0.0%
Year 1$41K+$8.4M$8.4M3.5%
Year 2$42K+$12.6M$12.7M5.3%
Year 3$44K+$12.6M$12.7M5.3%
Year 4$45K+$12.6M$12.7M5.3%
Year 5$46K+$12.6M$12.7M5.3%
$400K
Entry EV (10x)
$139.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$138.8M
Value Created
$12.7M
Exit EBITDA
$64K
Organic Growth
$126.1M
RCM Value Creation
$12.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$77K$115K$153K$184K
Total$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$15.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 81 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.0%-9.7%0.3%7.0%
P45
Net-to-Gross21.8%21.6%26.9%30.8%
P27
Occupancy79.6%48.0%56.8%71.2%
P85
Rev/Bed$1.4M$958K$1.3M$1.6M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.4M$720K$1.3M$1.6M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML