Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRAIRIE ST. JOHNS 2026-04-26 06:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRAIRIE ST. JOHNS
CCN 354004 | ND | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $8.2M → Pro Forma $10.6M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$44.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$662K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$892K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$883K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$543K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$892K$892K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$859K$25K$883K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$137K$406K$543K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$223K$446K$669K$892K$892K$892K$892K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$221K$442K$662K$883K$883K$883K$883K
A/R Days Reduction$0$181K$362K$543K$543K$543K$543K$543K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$639K$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.2M$8.2M18.5%
Year 1$8.5M+$1.6M$10.1M22.6%
Year 2$8.7M+$2.3M$11.1M24.9%
Year 3$9.0M+$2.3M$11.4M25.5%
Year 4$9.3M+$2.3M$11.6M26.1%
Year 5$9.6M+$2.3M$11.9M26.7%
$82.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$131.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.5M
Value Created
$11.9M
Exit EBITDA
$13.1M
Organic Growth
$23.5M
RCM Value Creation
$11.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$446K$669K$892K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$442K$662K$883K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$271K$407K$543K$651K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$29K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2131 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.5%-13.9%-3.2%7.8%
P90
Net-to-Gross40.4%19.9%28.5%39.4%
P76
Occupancy82.3%45.9%60.8%75.2%
P86
Rev/Bed$372K$460K$1.1M$1.7M
P20
Exp/Bed$303K$453K$1.1M$1.7M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML