Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ND STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ND STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 354003 | ND | 81 beds | Current EBITDA $557K → Pro Forma $933K (+$376K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$557K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$376K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$933K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+540bps
Margin Improvement
$267K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$376K
Modeled Uplift
$272K
Risk-Adjusted
-$104K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$142K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$139K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$85K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+14bp
Total EBITDA Impact$376K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$134K$8K$142K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$139K$139K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$21K$63K$85K$267K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$36K$71K$107K$142K$142K$142K$142K
Cost to Collect$0$35K$70K$104K$139K$139K$139K$139K
A/R Days Reduction$0$28K$56K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$103K$207K$306K$376K$376K$376K$376K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $376K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$557K$557K8.0%
Year 1$574K+$251K$824K11.8%
Year 2$591K+$376K$967K13.9%
Year 3$609K+$376K$985K14.1%
Year 4$627K+$376K$1.0M14.4%
Year 5$646K+$376K$1.0M14.7%
$5.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.7M
Value Created
$1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$887K
Organic Growth
$3.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$71K$107K$142K$171K
Cost to Collect$70K$104K$139K$167K
A/R Days Reduction$42K$64K$85K$102K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$188K$282K$376K$451K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-19.4%-5.4%18.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross100.0%31.9%37.6%42.4%
P88
Occupancy93.8%55.5%74.5%88.5%
P75
Rev/Bed$86K$249K$502K$1.9M
P0
Exp/Bed$545K$283K$529K$2.4M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML