Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LINTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LINTON HOSPITAL
CCN 351328 | ND | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.0M → Pro Forma $-1.5M (+$485K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$485K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$348K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$485K
Modeled Uplift
$292K
Risk-Adjusted
-$193K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$183K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$182K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$110K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$485K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$175K$8K$183K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$182K$182K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$83K$110K$348K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT89.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$92K$137K$183K$183K$183K$183K
Cost to Collect$0$45K$91K$136K$182K$182K$182K$182K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$74K$110K$110K$110K$110K$110K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$133K$266K$394K$485K$485K$485K$485K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $485K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.0M$-2.0M-22.0%
Year 1$-2.1M+$323K$-1.7M-19.1%
Year 2$-2.1M+$485K$-1.6M-18.0%
Year 3$-2.2M+$485K$-1.7M-18.7%
Year 4$-2.2M+$485K$-1.8M-19.4%
Year 5$-2.3M+$485K$-1.8M-20.2%
$-20.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-20.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-167K
Value Created
$-1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.2M
Organic Growth
$4.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$92K$137K$183K$220K
Cost to Collect$91K$136K$182K$218K
A/R Days Reduction$55K$83K$110K$133K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$242K$364K$485K$582K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.0%-20.4%-9.3%-3.7%
P18
Net-to-Gross85.3%63.9%77.0%89.2%
P68
Occupancy14.7%13.0%22.0%38.8%
P30
Rev/Bed$648K$472K$645K$1.2M
P50
Exp/Bed$791K$533K$791K$1.3M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML