Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASHLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASHLEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 351322 | ND | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $-796K (+$490K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$490K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-796K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$352K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$490K
Modeled Uplift
$285K
Risk-Adjusted
-$205K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$185K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$184K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$112K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$490K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$177K$8K$185K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$84K$112K$352K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT89.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$93K$139K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$92K$138K$184K$184K$184K$184K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$74K$112K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$134K$268K$398K$490K$490K$490K$490K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $490K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-14.0%
Year 1$-1.3M+$327K$-998K-10.9%
Year 2$-1.4M+$490K$-874K-9.5%
Year 3$-1.4M+$490K$-915K-10.0%
Year 4$-1.4M+$490K$-957K-10.4%
Year 5$-1.5M+$490K$-1.0M-10.9%
$-12.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.9M
Value Created
$-1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.0M
Organic Growth
$4.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$93K$139K$185K$222K
Cost to Collect$92K$138K$184K$220K
A/R Days Reduction$56K$84K$112K$134K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$245K$367K$490K$588K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.0%-20.4%-9.3%-3.7%
P35
Net-to-Gross100.0%59.3%76.6%89.5%
P89
Occupancy11.5%13.5%22.7%45.7%
P20
Rev/Bed$459K$458K$642K$1.0M
P27
Exp/Bed$523K$527K$697K$1.3M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML