Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WISHEK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WISHEK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 351321 | ND | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.7M → Pro Forma $-1.3M (+$407K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$407K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+538bps
Margin Improvement
$291K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$407K
Modeled Uplift
$240K
Risk-Adjusted
-$167K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$154K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$151K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$92K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$407K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$146K$8K$154K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$151K$151K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$23K$69K$92K$291K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT89.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$39K$77K$116K$154K$154K$154K$154K
Cost to Collect$0$38K$76K$114K$151K$151K$151K$151K
A/R Days Reduction$0$31K$61K$92K$92K$92K$92K$92K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$112K$224K$331K$407K$407K$407K$407K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $407K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.7M$-1.7M-22.5%
Year 1$-1.8M+$272K$-1.5M-19.6%
Year 2$-1.8M+$407K$-1.4M-18.5%
Year 3$-1.9M+$407K$-1.5M-19.2%
Year 4$-1.9M+$407K$-1.5M-19.9%
Year 5$-2.0M+$407K$-1.6M-20.7%
$-17.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-17.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-208K
Value Created
$-1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.7M
Organic Growth
$4.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$77K$116K$154K$185K
Cost to Collect$76K$114K$151K$182K
A/R Days Reduction$46K$69K$92K$111K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$204K$305K$407K$489K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.5%-20.4%-9.0%-2.4%
P16
Net-to-Gross77.5%55.3%76.3%89.2%
P55
Occupancy7.9%13.7%26.3%48.4%
P5
Rev/Bed$316K$452K$636K$1.0M
P8
Exp/Bed$387K$513K$695K$1.3M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML